Thank you to the Korean-American Pharmacists Community and the Indian-American Pharmacists Community.
I believe the various references you have reported will be a strong defense against the attacks we are receiving.
If the company that attacks us formally sues us, we will notify your community.
The law firm we’ve appointed has already completed a sufficient review of the data and secured enough evidence to refute their claims.
In particular, it is not normal to attack prototypes that are not mass-produced.
Their lawyer insisted that they wanted a smooth solution. The problem is that despite having a direct conversation channel, they appointed a lawyer to attack. They asked me for a smooth solution because they thought they would be at a disadvantage now.
First of all, it’s not a copyright violation.
Second, the shape and composition of the vision detector is much the same. The only thing they claim to resemble is a collection box. However, this collection box is already applied to other products first. Therefore, it is contradictory to claim that they have copied their products entirely. Thankfully, the various evidence you provide us with has pleased our lawyers.
We can try with them, so I won’t write down the details.
I would like to express my deep gratitude to the American pharmacists who supported me, even though I didn’t even think about it.